Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01746
Original file (BC 2014 01746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01746

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Separation Program Designator (SPD) and Reentry (RE) codes 
be changed to allow him to re-enlist into Air Force Reserve. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was informed that he could continue serving his time in the 
Reserve upon his discharge from the Air Force. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on       
21 Aug 96.

On 1 Feb 13, according to an AF Form 416, Selective Reenlistment 
Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air 
Force/Air Force Reserve, the applicant’s supervisor recommended 
he be denied reenlistment.

On 1 Feb 13, the applicant’s commander concurred with the 
supervisor’s recommendation and denied the applicant 
reenlistment, indicating the applicant had failed five fitness 
assessments in the last 24 months and, as a result, was issued 
two letters of reprimand and an unfavorable information file 
(UIF) was established.  

On 26 Sep 13, the Secretary of the Air Force’s designee denied 
the applicant’s appeal of non-selection of re-enlistment  under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2606,  Reenlistment In The United 
States Air Force.

On 14 Dec 13, the applicant was honorably discharged, issued a 
narrative reason for separation of “Non-Retention on Active 
Duty,” an RE code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman 
considered but not selected for reenlistment), an SPD code of 
LGH, and was credited with 17 years, 3 months, and 24 days of 
active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The applicant was separated under the 
FY13 Force Management Program with an RE code of 2X, first-term, 
second term or career airman, considered but not selected for 
reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). 
Based upon the applicant's denial of reenlistment, he was 
properly separated with a Separation Code of"LGH"- "Nonretention 
on active duty" which was properly reflected on his DD Form 214.  
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel 
records, the release from active duty was consistent with the 
procedural and substantive requirements of the SecAF memorandum 
and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01746 in Executive Session on 19 Feb 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
	
	
The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Apr 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 5 May 14.
     	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01281

    Original file (BC 2014 01281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code “LGH” (Non- retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594

    Original file (BC 2014 00594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03717

    Original file (BC 2013 03717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His separation code of “LBK” (Expiration of Term of Service) be changed due to inconsistencies in his military personnel records. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 Jan 04. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his separation code,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463

    Original file (BC 2013 03463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00175

    Original file (BC-2013-00175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00175

    Original file (BC 2013 00175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03060

    Original file (BC 2014 03060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his SPD code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding the processing of his discharge. On 28 May 14, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00360

    Original file (BC 2014 00360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum (PSDM) 13-14, FY13 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, dated 13 Feb 13 states that members with less than 6 years of active service separated under the DOS Rollback program will be separated with SPD code “JBK.” Her AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, Item 23, Remarks, reads SPD code “JBK.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If any recoupment of unearned portions of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00009

    Original file (BC 2014 00009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 24 Jan 14, for a period of three years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial with respect to the applicant’s request for his lost time to be reinstated. A complete copy of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451

    Original file (BC 2013 03451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...